Pis’ma v ZhETF, vol. 109, iss. 2, pp. 82 - 84
© 2019
January 25
Waveguiding in all-garnet heteroepitaxial magneto-optical
photonic crystals
A. M. Grishin+∗1), S. I. Khartsev+
+KTH Royal Institute of Technology, SE-164 40 Stockholm-Kista, Sweden
Petrozavodsk State University, 185910 Petrozavodsk, Karelian Republic, Russia
Submitted 15 November 2018
Resubmitted 15 November 2018
Accepted 21
November 2018
DOI: 10.1134/S0370274X19020024
Over the past two decades materials with forbidden
A series of heteroepitaxial [BIG/SGG]m MOPCs
photonic band have formed a rapidly expanding niche of
have been fabricated by RF-magnetron sputtering of
photonics. They demonstrated great potential for light
composite 3Bi2O3 + 5Fe2O3 oxide and stoichiometric
guiding, filtering, and switching, exceptional dispersion
Sm3Ga5O12 (SGG) targets on single crystal Ca, Mg,
properties and promise integration with Complemen-
Zr :Gd3Ga5O12(111) substrates [9]. In both mirrors,
tary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) devices on Si
thickness of layers of Bragg reflectors was chosen to be
platform. Magnetic photonic band gap materials attract
equal a quarter of wavelength λres/4nBIG(SGG) in the
special interest since they possess nonreciprocal prop-
respective material, whereas the BIG in the optical res-
erties thus can serve as optical isolators (e.g., [1] and
onance cavity has a thickness λ/2nBIG. Refractive in-
references therein).
dices of BIG and SGG at the designed λres = 750 nm
M. Inoue et al. fabricated and tested the first
equal to nBIG = 2.679 and nSGG = 1.960.
1D magneto-optical (MO) photonic crystals (MOPCs)
Figure presents optical spectra of transmission T and
with Ta2O5/SiO2 dielectric mirrors and various MO-
FR angle ΘF for TM- and TE-polarized light incident at
materials for the central optical cavity: polycrystalline
an angle φ on 750-[BIG/SGG]5 MOPC with five pairs of
Bi-substituted dysprosium and yttrium iron garnets as
BIG/SGG reflectors. The oblique geometry removes the
well as granular Co-Sm-O and Fe-Si-O magnetic lay-
degeneracy of TE and TM polarizations that occurred
ers [2].
at normal incidence (φ = 0). All the resonant features
Significant breakthrough has been achieved using
as edges of the band gap and resonant central peaks
completely substituted bismuth iron garnet Bi3Fe5O12
experience signi-cant about 60 nm “blueshift” when the
(BIG) as a Faraday rotator with a record Faraday
incidence angle φ increases up to 70.
rotation (FR) ΘF = -8.4 deg/µm at 633 nm [3-5]. The
TM and TE polarizations behave differently: res-
first all-garnet 1D heteroepitaxial pulsed laser deposited
onant peak of TM-mode transmission has a constant
Bi3Fe5O12/Y3Fe5O12 MOPC at designed wavelength of
height whereas an intensity of transmitted TE-polarized
750 nm showed 140 % increased of FR compared with a
light rapidly decreases. Faraday rotation acts in an op-
single layer BIG of equivalent thickness [6]. Finally, the
posite way: a height of resonant peak of FR falls down
cutting edge results on MO properties were achieved in
with an angle φ increase for TM- and exceedingly grows
radio frequency (RF)-sputtered latching-type lumines-
for TE-polarized light.
cent
[Bi2.97Er0.03Fe4Al0.5Ga0.5Fe5O12/Sm3Ga5O12]m
Comparison of T and ΘF spectra for transmitted and
MOPCs. To the date, at λres
= 775(640)nm, FR
reflected light concludes that TM-mode exhibits twice
ΘF
=
-14.1(14.8)deg/µm represents the highest
stronger reflectivity within the stop band and signifi-
achieved MO performance. Compared to a single layer
cantly higher resonant transparency than TE-polarized
BIG film, specific FR ΘF was increased by the factor of
light.
12 [7,8].
The angular dependence of the resonance wave-
In this paper we present results on MO effects in
length λres(φ) has universal character for both the TM
transmission and FR of TM- and TE-polarized incident
and TE polarizations and nicely fits to the formula that
light that make evident resonant TE-mode waveguiding
expresses the condition of constructive light interfer-
within a MOPC cavity.
ence in the crystal with an effective refractive index neff:
λ(φ) = λ(0)[1 - (sin φ/neff)2]1/2.
The following observations testify the resonant TE-
1)e-mail: grishin@kth.se
mode waveguiding within a MOPC cavity:
82
Письма в ЖЭТФ том 109 вып. 1 - 2
2019
Waveguiding in all-garnet heteroepitaxial magneto-optical photonic crystals
83
Fig. 1. (Color online) Transmission T and Faraday rotation ΘF spectra for TM and TE polarizations in the 750-[BIG/SGG]5
MOPC at various incidence angles φ. 750-[BIG/SGG]4 MOPC is shown schematically in inset in the right frame. In lower
inset, experimental angular dependence of the position λres(φ) of transmission resonance peak for TE and TM polarizations
is fitted to the Fabry-Pérot formula with the effective refraction index neff = 2.48. At φ = 60 and 70, too low intensity
of transmitted TE-polarized light makes difficult to obtain reliable Faraday rotation data for the wavelengths shorter than
620 nm
• significant reduction of transmissivity T of the res-
2. M. Inoue, R. Fujikawa, A. Baryshev, A. Khanikaev,
onant TE-mode compared to the TM-polarized light;
P. B. Lim, H. Uchida, O. Aktsipetrov, A. Fedyanin,
• very strong enhancement of FR ΘF of transmit-
T. Murzina, and A. Granovsky, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys.
39, R151 (2006).
ted TE-mode and, respectively, reduction of FR of TM-
3. T. Okuda, N. Koshizuka, K. Hayashi, K. Satoh,
polarized light at the resonant wavelength λres;
H. Taniguchi, and H. Yamamoto, IEEE Transl. J. Magn.
• much lower reflectance of TE-polarized light com-
Jpn. 3, 483 (1988).
pared to the TM-mode.
4. B. M. Simion, G. Thomas, R. Ramesh, V. G. Keramidas,
A.M. Grishin acknowledges the financial support
and R. L. Pfeffer, Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 830 (1995).
received within Russian Federal Targeted Program
5. N. Adachi, V. P. Denysenkov, S. I. Khartsev, A. M. Gri-
“R&D for priority areas of the development of S&T
shin, and T. Okuda, J. Appl. Phys. 88, 2734 (2000).
complex of Russia
2014-2020” (unique identifier
6. S. Kahl and A. M. Grishin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 84, 1438
RFMEFI58317X0067).
(2004).
Full text of the paper is published in JETP Letters
7. S. I. Khartsev and A. M. Grishin, Opt. Lett. 36, 2806
(2011).
journal. DOI: 10.1134/S0021364019020012
8. N. Ansari, S. I. Khartsev, and A. M. Grishin, Opt. Lett.
37, 3552 (2012).
1. V. I. Belotelov, L. E. Kreilkamp, I. A. Akimov et al. (Col-
9. A. M. Grishin and S. I. Khartsev, J. Appl. Phys. 101,
laboration), Nature Comm. 4, 2128 (2013).
053906 (2007).
Письма в ЖЭТФ том 109 вып. 1 - 2
2019
6