Pis’ma v ZhETF, vol. 109, iss. 12, pp. 826 - 827
© 2019
June 25
Ordering of Fe and Zn ions and magnetic properties of FeZnMo3O8
S. V. Streltsov+∗1), D.-J. Huang×, I. V. Solovyev∗◦, D. I. Khomskii
+M. N. Mikheev Institute of Metal Physics, Russian Academy of Science, 620041 Ekaterinburg, Russia
Ural Federal University, 620002 Ekaterinburg, Russia
×National Synchrotron Radiation Research Center, 30076 Hsinchu, Taiwan
National Institute for Materials Sciences, Tsukuba, 305-0044 Ibaraki, Japan
II. Physikalisches Institut, Universität zu Köln, D-50937 Köln, Germany
Submitted 27 April 2019
Resubmitted 27 April 2019
Accepted 16
May 2019
DOI: 10.1134/S0370274X1912004X
One of the main problems in mixed
The bulk experimental data show that the substitu-
(Fe1-xZnx)2Mo3O8 materials is the distribution of
tion of Fe by Zn in Fe2Mo3O8 changes magnetic ordering
constituent ions among inequivalent sites, octahedral
from antiferromagnetic (AFM) to ferromagnetic (FM),
and tetrahedral ones [1, 2]. Also the magnitude and the
in particular for half-doping x = 1, in FeZnMo3O8[1, 3].
sign of exchange interactions in these materials is not
Our preliminary spectroscopic data [4] point toward
clear a priori. As one sees from the crystal structure,
preferential location of Zn in tetrahedral sites; this also
shown in Fig. 1, there are several inequivalent exchange
agrees with the old estimates [5]. If true, this would
make the magnetic subsystem in FeZnMo3O8 relatively
simple: only octahedral sites would be occupied by mag-
netic ions Fe2+, so that only one type of exchange, the
diagonal interlayer Fe-Fe exchange JcOO remains, and if
this would be ferromagnetic, it could explain the ob-
served magnetic behavior. However, from the existing
experimental data one cannot yet make definite conclu-
sions in this respect, although they indeed point in this
direction.
We used pseudopotential VASP code to calcu-
late electronic, magnetic, and structural properties of
Fig. 1. (Color online) Different possible exchange coupling
FeZnMo3O8 [6]. Exchange parameters for Heisenberg
parameters in M2Mo3O8 type of structures
model were calculated using JaSS code [7].
We start our investigation by studying effect of ex-
passes even for nearest neighbour interaction: in-plane
change interaction on distribution of Fe and Zn ions
JabOT and interlayer JcOO, JcTT, and JcOT exchanges.
among octahedral and tetrahedral positions. In particu-
Moreover, the “vertical” exchanges between octahedral
lar we calculated exchange parameters in FeZnMo3O8
and tetrahedral Fe ions might be also different - JcOT
for various occupations of four available positions in
and JcTO, because of the orientation of MO4 tetrahedra
the unit cell by two Fe ions keeping the crystal struc-
(which all point in the same direction, this is in fact
ture untouched. Finding total energy difference between
what makes these systems polar). Since Fe2Mo3O8 is
FM and AFM configurations we obtain that JabOT =
known to be a multiferroic, i.e., a material in which
= 0.96 meV, JcOT = -0.61 meV, JcTT = 0.03 meV, and
electronic, magnetic, and structural properties are
JcOO = 0.01 meV, if Heisenberg model is written in the
strongly coupled, one might expect that exchange
form H =i=j Jij SiSj . Thus, one may see from these
interaction may affect crystal structure of doped
results that exchange interaction would stabilize config-
(Fe1-xZnx)2Mo3O8 as well.
uration with Fe ions occupying equally tetrahedral and
octahedral positions, but concentrated in the same plane
1)e-mail: streltsov@imp.uran.ru
(to maximize gain in magnetic energy due to JabOT).
826
Письма в ЖЭТФ том 109 вып. 11 - 12
2019
Ordering of Fe and Zn ions and magnetic properties of FeZnMo3O8
827
Next we relaxed the crystal structure of FeZnMo3O8
[3, 9, 10]. The most important question here is the dis-
for different Fe and Mo distributions in two possible
tribution of Fe and Zn at different positions (octahedral,
magnetic orders (FM and AFM). Results are summa-
tetrahedral) existing in these systems. This is very im-
rized in Table 1. First, one may see that the state with
portant for all the properties of corresponding systems.
all Fe ions occupying octahedral positions has the lowest
We demonstrated that there is very strong preference of
total energy. Moreover, the energy of any 50 : 50 config-
Zn to occupy the tetrahedral sites, so that for 50 % sub-
uration (50 % Fe is octahedral and 50 % Zn is in tetra-
stitution, in the title compound FeZnMo3O8, all tetra-
hedral positions) is equal to about half of the energy
hedral sites are occupied by nonmagnetic Zn, and mag-
difference between configurations, where all Fe ions are
netic Fe ions are all in octahedral positions. This, to-
in octahedral positions. This means that this is not mag-
gether with the ferromagnetic octahedral-octahedral ex-
netic energy, but lattice distortions (i.e., elastic energy),
change, which we calculated theoretically, naturally ex-
which decides which positions are occupied by Fe ions.
plains ferromagnetic ordering observed in FeZnMo3O8
Quite naturally, the energy scales of magnetic and elas-
experimentally. These results will be also very useful
tic interactions differ by about three orders of magni-
for interpreting spectroscopic data on FeZnMo3O8 [4].
tude.
Apparently the tendency of relative distribution of dif-
ferent ions in this class of materials, determined, as we
Table 1. Energies (per formula unit) of different distributions of
demonstrated above, mainly by the size of respective
Fe and Zn ions among octahedral (O1 and O2) and tetrahedral
(T1 and T2) positions, as obtained after optimization of the ionic
ions, might also work in other systems of this interest-
positions in the GGA + U (Generalized gradient approximation
ing class.
taking into account Coulomb correlations) calculations
The work was supported by Russian Science Foun-
O1
O2
T1
T2
Magnetic order
Energy, eV
dation via project 17-12-01207.
Fe
Fe
Zn Zn
FM
0
Full text of the paper is published in JETP Letters
Fe
Fe
Zn Zn
AFM
0.0002
journal. DOI: 10.1134/S0021364019120026
Zn
Zn
Fe
Fe
FM
1.2702
Zn
Zn
Fe
Fe
AFM
1.2698
1. F. Varret, H. Czeskleba, F. Hartmann-Boutron, and
Fe
Zn
Fe
Zn
FM
0.6405
P. Imbert, J. Phys. France 33, 549 (1972).
Fe
Zn
Fe
Zn
AFM
0.6403
2. H. Czeskleba, P. Imbert, and F. Varret, AIP Conference
Fe
Zn
Zn
Fe
FM
0.6440
Proceedings 5, 811 (1972).
Fe
Zn
Zn
Fe
AFM
0.6301
3. T. Kurumaji, Y. Takahashi, J. Fujioka, R. Masuda,
H. Shishikura, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev.
B 95, 020405 (2017).
Preferable occupations of octahedral positions by Fe
4. H.-Y. Huang, A. Singh, A. Nag, K. Zhou, A. Wal-
and not by Zn ions is due to its larger ionic radius
ters, M. Garcia-Fernandez, J. Okamoto, A. Chainani,
(Rocta
= 0.78Å, Rocta
= 0.74Å and Rtetra
= 0.63Å,
Fe2+
Zn2+
Fe2+
Y.-M. Sheu, T. Kurumaji, Y. Tokura, C.-T. Chen, and
Rtetra
= 0.60Å [8]), so that it is natural for larger
Zn2+
D.-J. Huang, Book of Abstracts, APS March Meeting
ions to go in a larger polyhedron. Indeed, if we put
2019, C02.00004 (2019).
smaller Zn to an octahedron it gets more distorted. For
5. D. Bertrand and H. Kerner-Szeskleba, Le J. Phys.
example, the bond angle variance defined as 〈σ2〉 =
Colloq. 36, 379 (1975).
m
=
i - φ0)2/(m - 1) (here m is the number of
i=1
6. G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Phys. Rev. B 54, 11169
bond angles and φ0 is the bond angle for regular octa-
(1996).
hedron) increases from 69.1, when Fe is in octahedral
7. S. Streltsov, Z. V. Pchelkina, and V. V. Gapontsev,
positions, to 74.4, when Zn sits in octahedra.
www.jass-code.org.
To summarise, we studied theoretically the very in-
8. R. D. Shannon, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 32, 751 (1976).
teresting system of the novel class M2Mo3O8 (M = Mn,
9. S. Yu, B. Gao, J. W. Kim, S.-W. Cheong, M. K. L. Man,
Fe, Co, Ni, Zn) with polar crystal structure, which shows
J. Mado, K. M. Dani, and D. Talbayev, Phys. Rev. Lett.
diverse magnetic properties and very interesting mag-
120, 037601 (2018).
netoelectric effects. Specifically we concentrated on the
10. T. Kurumaji, Y. Takahashi, J. Fujioka, R. Masuda,
mixed materials of this class (Fe1-xZnx)2Mo3O8, for
H. Shishikura, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev.
which most experimental studies are done at present
Lett. 119, 077206 (2017).
Письма в ЖЭТФ том 109 вып. 11 - 12
2019