Pis’ma v ZhETF, vol. 110, iss. 3, pp. 163 - 164
© 2019 August 10
Layered superconductor in a magnetic field: breakdown of the effective
masses model
A. G. Lebed1)
Department of Physics, University of Arizona, 1118 E. 4-th Street, AZ 85721 Tucson, USA
L. D. Landau Institute for Theoretical Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 117334 Moscow, Russia
Submitted 14 June 2019
Resubmitted 14 June 2019
Accepted 15
June 2019
DOI: 10.1134/S0370274X19150049
The upper critical magnetic field, Hc2(T ), is known
H∥c2(0) ≈ 0.75 |dH∥c2/dT|Tc Tc,
(1)
to be one of the most important properties of the type-
for a parallel magnetic field. We recall that, for a perpen-
II superconductors. It destroys superconductivity due
dicular magnetic field the corresponding solution is ex-
to the orbital Meissner currents in case, where we can
ponential one and gives much smaller coefficient - 0.59,
disregard the Pauli spin-splitting paramagnetic effects.
as shown by different method in [7]:
The Ginzburg-Landau (GL) theory gave tools to calcu-
late a slope of the Hc2(T ) [1] in the vicinity of super-
H⊥c2(0) ≈ 0.59 |dH⊥c2/dT|Tc Tc.
(2)
conducting transition temperature, (Tc-T)/Tc ≪ 1. On
the other hand, at zero temperature, the upper critical
Note that Eqs. (1) and (2) directly break the effective
magnetic field was calculated for an isotropic 3D super-
mass model, since the corresponding coefficients, 0.75
conductor in [2]. Temperature dependence of Hc2(T) in
and 0.59 are not close to each other.
a whole temperature region in an isotropic 3D super-
In the Letter, we consider a layered superconductor
conductor was calculated later in [3]. Important gen-
with the following realistic Q2D electron spectrum:
eralization of the GL theory to the case of anisotropic
1
superconductors was obtained in [4], where the so-called
ǫ(p) =
(p2x + p2y) - 2t cos(pz c),
2m
effective mass model was implicitly introduced. The ef-
(3)
fective mass model, partially based on the results ob-
m
= mvF2,
tained in [4] in the GL region, states more: ratios of the
where m - the electron in-plane mass, t - the integral
upper critical magnetic fields measured along fixed dif-
of overlapping of electron wave functions in a perpen-
ferent directions do not much depend on temperature.
dicular to the conducting planes direction; ǫF , pF , and
Recently observed experimental temperature dependen-
vF are the Fermi energy, Fermi momentum, and Fermi
cies of anisotropy of the upper critical fields in layered
velocity, correspondingly; ℏ ≡ 1. In a parallel to the
compound MB2 [5] and other materials are prescribed
conducting planes magnetic field,
exclusively to many-band effects (see introductory part
of review [6]).
H = (0,H,0) , A = (0,0,-Hx),
(4)
The goal of our Letter is to consider the orbital ef-
fect in a parallel magnetic field in a Q2D conductor
we make use of the so-called Peierls substitution
at zero temperature, where we explicitly take into ac-
method:
count a Q2D anisotropy of the electron spectrum. In
(
)
(
)
contrast to [1-4,6], we demonstrate that, in a Q2D case
px → -i
, py → -i
,
∂x
∂y
in a parallel magnetic field, the solution of the so-called
(
)
)
gap equation can not be expressed as some exponential
c
evF cH
cpz → -ic
-
x, ωc(H) =
(5)
function. Moreover, we show that the above mentioned
∂z
vF
c
solution even changes a sign with changing space coor-
Under such conditions the electron orbital Hamiltonian
dinate. This leads to unusual value of the corresponding
in a magnetic field can be written in the following way:
coefficient, 0.75, in the equation,
)
(
)
1
(∂2
2
H
-2t cos -ic
-
ωc x . (6)
1)e-mail: lebed@email.arizona.edu
= -2m ∂x2 +
∂y2
∂z
vF
Письма в ЖЭТФ том 110 вып. 3 - 4
2019
163
2
164
A. G. Lebed
Using the standard procedure [2], we linearize the
Hamiltonian (6) with respect to the derivative
. As
∂x
a result, the problem becomes exactly solvable (see, for
example, [8]). It is straightforward to find the Matsub-
ara’s Green’s functions [8,9] in the magnetic field (4)
and, then, to find the following Gor’kov’s gap equation,
which determines the parallel upper critical magnetic
field at any temperature:
2πTdz
Δ(x) = g
(
) ×
2πT z
d vF sinh
vF
{
}
2tωc
Fig. 1. (Color online) Solution of Eq. (7) for the Q2D con-
×J0
[z(2x + z sin α)] Δ(x + z sin α)
,
(7)
ductor (3) in the parallel magnetic field (4) is shown. We
v2
F
α
pay attention to the fact that the solution is not of the
where Δ(x) is the so-called superconducting gap, g is
Gaussian form, moreover it changes its sign several times
the coupling constant, d is the cut-off distance; < ... >α
with changing variable x
stands for averaging procedure over angle α.
For the perpendicular upper critical magnetic field
We recall that Eq. (7) determines the parallel upper
the corresponding results were obtained earlier [7] [see
critical field at any temperatures. It is possible to prove
that near transition temperature, τ = Tc-T
≪ 1, it
Eq. (2)]. Therefore, we predict in the Letter an increase ][
Tc
reduces to differential GL equation:
of the Q2D anisotropy, γ(T) =Hc2(T)
, with decreas-
H⊥c2(T)
)2
ing temperature:
d2Δ(x)
(2πH
2
+
ξ2⊥x2Δ(x) - τΔ(x) = 0,
(8)
dx2
φ0
[H∥c2(T)]
lim
γ(T ) = lim
= 1.27 lim γ(T).
(14)
T →0
T →0 H⊥c2(T )
T →Tc
7ζ(3)vF
7ζ(3)tc
ξ =
,
ξ =
,
(9)
We note that, in the Letter, we have not taken into
4
2πTc
2
2πTc
account quantum effects of electron motion along open
where φ0 =πce is the magnetic flux quantum and ζ(x)
orbits [10] and have considered case, where tc > Tc,
is zeta-Riemann function. It is important that Eq. (8)
which is opposite to the Lawrence-Doniach model [11].
can be analytically solved [1] and expression for the GL
Full text of the paper is published in JETP Letters
upper critical field slope can be analytically written:
journal. DOI: 10.1134/S0021364019150025
(
)
[
]
φ0
2cT2c
H∥c2 = τ
(10)
1. A. A. Abrikosov, Fundamentals of Theory of Metals, El-
2πξξ
7ζ(3)evF tc
sevier Science, Amsterdam (1988).
2. L. P. Gor’kov, Sov. Phys. JETP 37(10), 42 (1960).
To consider the Eq. (7) at T = 0, it is convenient to
3. N. R. Werthamer, E. Helfand, and P. C. Hohenberg,
introduce the following new variables,
Phys. Rev. 147, 295 (1966).
√2tωc
4. L. P. Gor’kov and T. K. Melik-Barkhudarov, ZhETF 45,
z=
(x - x1),
x=
√2tωc x,
(11)
1493 (1964) [Sov. Phys. JETP 18, 1031 (1964)].
vF
vF
5. V. G. Kogan and S. L. Bud’ko, Physica C 385, 131
and rewrite Eq. (7) at T = 0, using new variables, as
(2003).
6. V. G. Kogan and R. Prozorov, Rep. Prog. Phys. 75,
dz
Δ(x) = g
J0[z(2x + zsinα)] ×
114502 (2012).
2t⊥ωc d
z
vF
7. T. Kita, Phys. Rev. B 68, 184503 (2003).
8. A. G. Lebed and K. Yamaji, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2697
× Δ(x + zsin α)
(12)
(1998).
α
9. A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor’kov, and I. E. Dzyaloshinskii,
Numerical solution of Eq. (12) (see Fig. 1) gives the fol-
Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Me-
lowing result for the parallel upper magnetic critical
chanics, Dover, N.Y. (1963).
field in terms of the GL slope (10):
10. A. G. Lebed, JETP Lett. 44, 114 (1986) [Pis’ma ZhTF
[
]
44, 89 (1986)].
2cT2c
11. L. N. Bulaevskii and A. A. Guseinov, Pis’ma ZhETF 19,
H∥c2(0) ≈ 0.75
= 0.75 |dH∥c2/dT|Tc Tc.
7ζ(3)evF tc
742 (1974) [JETP Lett. 19, 382 (1974)].
(13)
Письма в ЖЭТФ том 110 вып. 3 - 4
2019