Pis’ma v ZhETF, vol. 111, iss. 8, pp. 483 - 484
© 2020
April 25
States of12N with enhanced radii
A. S. Demyanovaa,1) A. N. Danilova, A. A. Ogloblina, V. I. Starastsina, S. V. Dmitrieva, W. H. Trzaskab,
S. A. Goncharovc, T. L. Belyaevad, V. A. Maslove, Yu. G. Soboleve, Yu. E. Penionzhkeviche, S. V. Khlebnikovf ,
G. P. Tyurinf , N. Burtebaevg, D. Janseitove,g, Yu. B. Gurovh, J. Loukob, V. M. Sergeeva,c
aNational Research Centre Kurchatov Institute, 123182 Moscow, Russia
bDepartment of Physics, University of Jyväskylä, FI-40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
cLomonosov Moscow State University, 119991 Moscow, Russia
dUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de México, 50000 Toluca, México
eFlerov Laboratory for Nuclear Research, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, 141980 Dubna, Russia
fV. G. Khlopin Radium Institute, 194021 St. Petersburg, Russia
g Institute of Nuclear Physics, National Nuclear Center of Republic of Kazakhstan, 050032 Almaty, Republic of Kazakhstan
hNational Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
Submitted 18 March 2020
Resubmitted 18 March 2020
Accepted 24
March 2020
DOI: 10.31857/S1234567820080017
Recently the evidence of the excited states of light
presumable have halos are determined in a more com-
nuclei with enlarged radii, located close to and above the
plicated manner: replacing the neutron in the halo state
particle emission threshold, was convincingly demon-
with a proton does not necessarily lead to the appear-
strated (see, e.g., [1] and references therein). The ex-
ance of a similar proton structure. The fact is that the
istence of neutron halos in the short-lived excited states
appearance of a halo is determined by the proximity of
of some stable and radioactive nuclei was revealed, in
the valence nucleon to the emission threshold, and it can
particular, by the asymptotic normalization coefficient
be very different for a neutron and a proton. One notable
(ANC) analysis of the neutron-transfer reactions [2, 3].
example is the IAS of mirror13C and13N nuclei.13C
The ANC analysis of the11B(d,p)12B reaction at
in the 1/2+, 3.09-MeV state has a neutron halo [2, 3]
Elab = 21.5 MeV was carried out in our group [4]. Radii
that satisfies all halo criterions. The 1/2+, 2.37-MeV
of the valence neutron for the first five excited states of
IAS in13N does not lie in the discrete spectrum, but in
12B were determined. Calculations showed that the rms
the continuum spectrum, and therefore the proton wave
radii of the last neutron in the second 2-(1.67 MeV)
function differs from the neutron one. An increase of the
and the third 1-(2.62 MeV) excited states of12B far
13N radius in this state is also observed [5].
exceed those for the ground state (g.s.) and the first
Now we study excited states of12N, namely the
2+(0.95 MeV) excited state. Moreover, a probability of
2+(0.96 MeV), 2-(1.19 MeV), and 1-(1.80 MeV) states
the last neutron to be outside the range of the interac-
of 12N. We propose to use the Modified Diffraction
tion radius, so-called D1 coefficient, was obtained to be
Model (MDM) method [5-7] and apply it to analyze the
53 and 62 %, respectively. It should be noted that a for-
(3He,t) reaction data. Obtained radii for12N in the 2-
mal criterion of a halo state is that D1 should be more
and 1- states will be compared with those received for
than 50 % and it is fulfilled in both cases.
the excited states of12B [4]. The problem is that existing
Accordingly to charge independence of nuclear
data are not completed enough to make definite conclu-
forces, mirror nuclei are isobars that have proton
sion about the radii of the 2- and 1- states in12N.
and neutron numbers interchanged. Some states of
The existing in the literature data are presented only at
mirror nuclei with the same quantum numbers (isospin,
three energies: 36 [8], 49.8 [9], and 81 MeV [10]. The data
spin/parity), isobaric analogue states (IAS), can form
at 36 MeV contain only the angular distributions for
the isospin or isotopic multiplets (doublets, triplets,
the g.s. and the 0.96-MeV states. The data at 49.8 MeV
etc.) and then approximately have the same structure
contain the angular distributions for the g.s., 0.96-MeV,
and radii.
and 1.20-MeV states. The data at 81 MeV contain all
Natural question arises: what we can expect in the
interested for us states, but they present only one in-
IAS of12B in the mirror12N nucleus? The IAS that
dinstinct oscillation in the angular distributions. The
angular distribution for the 0.96-MeV state obtained at
1)e-mail: a.s.demyanova@bk.ru
81 MeV [10] is not comparable with others, if it would
Письма в ЖЭТФ том 111 вып. 7 - 8
2020
483
4
484
A. S. Demyanova, A. N. Danilov, A. A. Ogloblin et al.
be drawn as a function of linear transferred momentum.
the 1.80 MeV state is 3.0±0.1 fm. These values are larger
This fact stimulate us to carried out a new experiment
than rms radius of the g.s. of12N 2.47 ± 0.07 fm [12].
on the12C(3He,t)12N reaction at E(3He)= 40 MeV.
The diffraction and rms radii of12C in the IAS were
The measurements were conducted at the University
determined by the MDM from the inelastic3He +12C
of Jyväskylä (Finland) using the K130 cyclotron [11] to
scattering [9]. Within the error bars, the rms radii of
produce a3He beam at E(3He) = 40 MeV. The 150 cm
12C in the 15.11-MeV 1+ and the 16.57-MeV 2- states
diameter Large Scattering Chamber was equipped with
agree with the rms radii of their IAS in12N. The pre-
four ΔE-E detector telescopes, each containing two in-
liminary ANC analysis in which excited states of12C
dependent ΔE detectors and one common E detector.
are considered as a weakly bounded (effective positive
So each device allowed carrying out measurements at
energy of a valence proton, ε ≈ 0.01 MeV), gives ap-
two angles. The measurements in c.m. angular range 10
proximately the same radii. Moreover, D1 coefficient for
were conducted in one exposure. The differential cross
the 2- state is more than 50 %, which indicate that the
sections of the12C(3He,t)12N reaction were measured
16.57-MeV 2- state of12C can be considered as a proton
in the c.m. angular range of 8-69. Self-supported12C
halo-like state. Complete results of the ANC analysis
foils of 0.23 and 0.5 mg/cm2 thicknesses were used as
will be published later.
targets. The beam intensity was about 20 particle nA.
Finally, we revealed that12B,12N, and12C in the
Triton angular distributions for the g.s. and three
IAS with T = 1, and spin-parities 2- and 1- have in-
first excited states of12N: 0.96-MeV 2+, 1.19-MeV 2-,
creased radii and exhibit properties of neutron and pro-
and 1.80-MeV 1- were measured. The resulting differ-
ton halo states.
ential cross sections for the12C(3He,t)12N reaction with
Full text of the paper is published in JETP Letters
DWBA calculations are presented in Fig. 1.
journal. DOI: 10.1134/S0021364020080020
1.
A. A. Ogloblin, A. N. Danilov, A.S. Demyanova,
S. A. Goncharov, T. L. Belyaeva, and W. Trzaska, in Nu-
clear Particle Correlations and Cluster Physics, World
Scientific, Singapore (2017), p. 311.
2.
Z. H. Liu, C. J. Lin, H. Q. Zhang, Z. C. Li, J. S. Zhang,
Y. W. Wu, F. Yang, M. Ruan, J. C. Liu, S. Y. Li, and
Z. H. Peng, Phys. Rev. C 64, 034312 (2001).
3.
T. L. Belyaeva, R. Perez-Torres, A. A. Ogloblin,
A. S. Demyanova, S. N. Ershov, and S. A. Goncharov,
Phys. Rev. C 90, 064610 (2014).
4.
T. L. Belyaeva, S. A. Goncharov, A. S. Demyanova,
A. A. Ogloblin, A. N. Danilov, V. A. Maslov,
Yu. G. Sobolev, W. Trzaska, S. V. Khlebnikov,
G. P. Tyurin, N. Burtebaev, D. Janseitov, and
E. Mukhamejanov, Phys. Rev. C 98, 034602 (2018).
5.
A. S. Demyanova, A. A. Ogloblin, A.N. Danilov,
T. L. Belyaeva, S. A. Goncharov, and W. Trzaska, JETP
Fig. 1.
Triton angular distributions from the
Lett. 104, 526 (2016).
12C(3He,t)12N reaction at E(3He) = 40 MeV popu-
6.
A. S. Demyanova, A.A. Ogloblin, S. A. Goncharov,
lated the
1+(g.s),
2+(0.96 MeV),
2-(1.19 MeV), and
A. N. Danilov, T. L. Belyaeva, and W. Trzaska, Phys.
1-(1.80 MeV) states of12N. The curves correspond to the
Atom. Nucl. 80, 831 (2017).
DWBA calculations
7.
A. N. Danilov, T. L. Belyaeva, A. S. Demyanova,
S. A. Goncharov, and A. A. Ogloblin, Phys. Rev. C 80,
054603 (2009).
Let us discuss the results of the MDM analysis of
8.
K. P. Artemov, Y.A. Glukhov, V.Z. Goldberg,
the existing and our new data on the12C(3He,t)12N re-
V. V. Davydov, I. P. Petrov, and V. P. Rudakov, Yad.
action at 40 MeV.
Fiz. 11, 43 (1970).
We try to make estimations of rms radius of the g.s
9.
G. Ball and J. Cerny, Phys. Rev. 177, 1466 (1969).
of12N and got value: 2.8 ± 0.4 fm, which is consistent
10.
W. A. Sterrenburg, M. N. Harakeh, S. Y. van Der Werf,
with the estimates resulting from our DWBA analysis -
and A. van Der Woude, Nucl. Phys. A 405, 109 (1983).
2.9 fm.
11.
W. H. Trzaska, P. Heikkinen, A. N. Danilov, A.S. De-
myanova, S. V. Khlebnikov, T. Yu. Malamut,
Also the rms radii for the 1.19 MeV and 1.80 MeV
V. A. Maslov, A. A. Ogloblin, and Yu.G. Sobolev,
states were determined using MDM. The 1.19 MeV state
Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 903, 241 (2018).
is excited by transfer of two angular momentums L = 0
12.
A. Ozawa, T. Suzuki, and I. Tanihata, Nucl. Phys. A
and L = 2 and complicates analysis a bit. An average
693, 32 (2001).
value was found to be 2.8 ± 0.3 fm. The rms radius for
Письма в ЖЭТФ том 111 вып. 7 - 8
2020