Микология и фитопатология, 2020, T. 54, № 4, стр. 305-308

Micromycetes Rossicae: Сhorological and taxonomical notes. 1. Chrysomyxa succinea (Pucciniales, Basidiomycota) – new find for Saint Petersburg, European Russia

I. V. Zmitrovich 1*, V. A. Dudka 1**, S. V. Shevchuk 2***

1 Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
197376 St. Petersburg, Russia

2 Peter the Great Botanical Garden of Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences
197376 St. Petersburg, Russia

* E-mail: iv_zmitrovich@mail.ru
** E-mail: dudkavasiliy.a@gmail.com
*** E-mail: shevchuksv62@rambler.ru

Поступила в редакцию 15.02.2020
После доработки 15.04.2020
Принята к публикации 11.05.2020

Полный текст (PDF)

Аннотация

The present notice opens a paper series devoted to rare and interesting species of micromycetes causing rust and leaf spots found in various regions of Russia. In June 2019, an interesting species Chrysomyxa succinea, new to the European territory of Russia, was revealed at Peter the Great Botanical Garden of Komarov Botanical Institute (Saint Petersburg). The fungus colonized the leaves of Rhododendron ledebourii. Two infected plants were found at a certain distance from each other. The rust fungus Chrysomyxa succinea is common in Siberia, the Russian Far East, Japan, and China. Its aecidial stage develops almost exclusively on Picea jezoensis, whereas the uredinial stage develops on various Rhododendron species. In this notice, the uredinial/telial stages of Chrysomyxa succinea were characterized. The species in question differs from the closely related Ch. rhododendri in infesting a fresh leaves; certain differences in features of urediniospores ornamentation exist, too. The present notice also discusses a nature distribution range of the host plant, Rhododendron ledebourii, and the history of its introduction in Peter the Great Botanical Garden. It has been suggested that the infection occurred due to long-range propagules (uredi-niospores). Since the Chrysomyxa succinea is the macrocyclic rust, it can be assumed that its stages 0 and I can be found during careful examination of single Picea jezoensis representatives in Saint Petersburg arboreta.

Keywords: botanical gardens, distribution range, plant introduction, rare micromycetes species, rhododendrons, rust fungi

The genus Chrysomyxa Unger (Coleosporiaceae, Pucciniales, Pucciniomycetes, Basidiomycota) is presented by more than 30 species of rust fungi, characterized by external basidia and warty urediniospores which develop in chains with intercalary cells. Most of species in the genus form a subepidermal spermogonia and aecia of Peridermium-type. Their uredinia of Caeoma-type with reduced or absent peridium; telia develop subepidermally, flat or casnion-shaped, sometimes with small stalk. The telispores one-celled, laid in chains (Kuprevich, Transhel, 1957; Arthur, 1962; Azbukina, 2015).

This genus includes both macrocyclic heteroecious species (the aecia and spermogonia develop mainly on Picea, whereas uredinia, telia, and wintering mycelium are associated with evergreen leaves of ericaceous plants), and microcyclic ones, whose life cycle is represented by telia and occasionally by spermogonia (Savile, 1950).

Some genus representatives are widely distributed over European Russia, as Chrysomyxa cassandrae (Peck et G.P. Clinton) Tranzschel, Ch. empetri (Pers.) J. Schröt. ex Cummins, Ch. ledi de Bary, Ch. pirolata (Koern.) G. Winter in Rabenh., Ch. rhododendri (DC.) de Bary, Ch. woroninii Tranzschel. Their aecidial stage is associated mainly with Picea abies or P. obovata, whereas the uredinial stage – with rhododendrons and boreal bogs ericaceous plants (Kuprevich, Transhel, 1957; Spaulding, 1961; Azbukina, 2015).

Since 2019, we have begun special studies of Ericaceae s.l. mycobiota, including Rhododendron spp. and boreal bogs ericaceous plants. This notice opens a series of papers devoted to rare and interesting species of micromycetes of various regions of Russia that cause rust and leaf spots.

The leaves of living plants were herbarized according to standard reccommendations (Geltman, 1995). Dried shoots were viewed using the MBS-3 binocular stereoscopic microscope. The micromorphological analysis of the basidiomata was carried out using an Axio Scope A1 light microscope at the Laboratory of Systematics and Geography of the Fungi (BIN RAS). Micro-preparations for general hyphal morphology study were prepared using a 5% KOH solution. Such media as Melzer’s reagent, Congo Red, and 5% NH4OH solution were used to testing of thickened wall structures (spore surface sculpture). The urediniospores measurements were carried out into the distilled water. The material collected is loaned in the Mycolo-gical Herbarium of the BIN RAS (LE F).

In June 2019, on the territory of Peter the Great Botanical Garden of the Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of  Sciences, we have revealed the rust fungus Ch. succinea (Sacc.) Tranzschel. The fungus colonized the leaves and young fruits (Fig. 1, a–d) of Rhododendron ledebourii Pojark., whereas both infested plants were found that were 400 meters away from each other. The purpose of this notice is drawing attention to this interesting for European Russia rust species.

Fig. 1.

Chrysomyxa succinea (LE 330109) on Rhododendron ledebourii, Saint Petersburg: a – general view of affected leaves with mild symptoms of dying; b – urediniospores with ornamented exosporium; c – young fruits are affected spots of uredinium stage of the fungus; d – underside of current leaf with small spots of uredinium stage of the fungus. Scale bar – 10 μm.

The species was described as hyphomycete Gloeosporium succineum based on Altai type specimen (Saccardo, 1880), then assigned to the rust genus Chrysomyxa by V.G. Tranzschel (Transhel, 1939). Taxonomically, this is rather stable species (Cummins, Hiratsuka, 2003; Cao et al., 2017). This rust fungus is common in Siberia, in the Russian Far East (Azbukina, 2015), Japan (Hiratsuka, Sato, 1969; Farr et al., 1996), and China (Ji et al., 2020). Its aecidial stage develops almost exclusively on Picea jezoensis (Siebold et Zucc.) Carriere, whereas the uredinial stage develops on various species of Rhododendron: Rh. aureum Georgi (locus classicus), Rh. brachycarpum D. Don ex G. Don, Rh. dahuricum L., Rh. pseudochrysantum Hayata. On Rh. ledebourii, as far as we can judge from the available literature, the fungus is noted here for the first time. Below follows a characterization of uredinial (II) and telial (III) stages of this species, based on original measurements.

Chrysomyxa succinea (Sacc.) Tranzschel, Conspectus Uredinalium URSS: 70, 314, 1939. – Gloeosporium succineum Sacc., Michelia 2 (6): 146, 1880; Chrysomyxa expansa Dietel, Bot. Jb. 28 (3): 287, 1900; Ch. alpina Hirats. f., Bot. Mag., Tokyo 46: 471, 1929. – Fig. 1.

Uredinia develop on the underside of living leaves (occasionally on petioles) on the wintering mycelium, slightly oblong with rapidly disappearing peridium, orange or orange-yellow, grainy under lens. Urediniospores 17.5–37.8 × 10.5–25.7 μm, in the main fraction subglobose, up to short ellisoid-cylindrical, with a thickened ornamented wall (ornament with regular columns, giving a surface warts up to 3 μm high), with 3–5 equatorial pores and granular golden-yellow contents Fig. 1, b).

Telia develop on the underside of living leaves or young fruits, spotted, cushion-shaped or almost capitate, orange-yellow, 0.3–1.5 mm in the largest dimension. Teliospores in chains up to 250 μm long, 14–28.5 × 6.5–12.5 μm, smooth, thick-walled, with golden-yellow contents.

Material examined: Ch. succinea. – Russia, Saint Petersburg, Peter the Great Botanical Garden of the Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 59°58′08″N, 30°19′10″E, on Rhododendron ledebourii. Coll. 14.06.2019, det. 21.06.2019, V.A. Dudka and I.V. Zmitrovich (LE 330109).

Spermogonia (0) and aecia (I) of this species develop on spruce (the only Picea jezoensis was reported till now) and were not found by us. According to literature descriptions, the spermogonia are round, the aecia are oblong and develop on the underside of living needles; aeciospores 21–20 × 11–24 μm, ellipsoid to subglobose, thick-walled (Azbukina, 2015).

Another species, Chrysomyxa rhododendri also infests rhododendrons, but this species develops uredinia and telia on last year’s leaves as well as dry petioles and even shoots; the urediniospores of this species in comparison with Ch. succinea are slightly smaller on average, and the columnar ornamentation of their wall is less pronounced.

An early synonymy of the species was studied by Crane (2005). The earlier name, Ch. expansa, was given on life cycle features [the rust on Rhododendron brachycarpum (Chrysomyxa expansa) had only telia, whereas the rust on Rhododendron aureum (C. succinea) had both uredinia and telia]. However, field studies and inoculation experiments (Hiratsuka, Sato 1969) showed that uredinia are produced on Rhododendron brachycarpum var. roseum and that the uredinial stages on both rhododendron hosts, and the aecial stages produced on Picea jezoensis, are identical. The production of uredinia and telia might be influenced with the host species and by environmental conditions in a particular location or from year to year.

Concerning the host plant, Rhododendron ledebourii, this species was segregated from Rh. dauricum relatively recently (Poyarkova, 1952), and its independent species status is rather controversial issue.

According to M.S. Alexandrova (1975), main part of Rh. ledebourii distribution range lies on Siberia: in Altai and in the southern part of the Sayan Mountains, along the Enisey mountains and on the Tanu-Ola ridge. This species is especially widely represented in Altai (near the Chiket-Aman pass, the Karagem river valley, the vicinity of the villages of Elekmonar, Chemal, Mount Uzyuk, the Katun river basin, Mount Sitokha, the surroundings of Lake Teletsk, the village of Ust-Muta, the lower reaches of the Chumat-man river, Maralda mountain, Anosu river) and in the Western Sayan (Turlygan taskyl, Buiba river valley, Kaimarsky Arshan mountain, Mondy village, Hulugayshi river, Khantepru river, Bingolchik river, Torgalyna village, Ha-Kem river, and Belbei river, valley Shiraita River, the upper reaches of the Usa River, Mount Rossypi, Tannu-Ola Ridge, Ungush River Valley, Ulengest and Uryanhai river basins). Rh. ledebourii is one of the most common shrubs of Tuva, where it grows everywhere within the forest belt. Outside of Russia, the range of this species extends to the northwestern part of Mongolia.

It would be interesting in this regard to understand a nature of rust specie expansion into alien region. Rh. dauricum s.l. was appeared in the collection of Peter the Great Botanical Garden even before 1816 (Svyazeva, 2005). Since 1910s, its evergreen forms were singled out in the collection catalogues of Peter the Great Botanical Garden. In 1952, these forms were segregated as independent species, Rh. ledebourii. The plant infested by Chrysomyxa coccinea, was entered to Peter the Great Botanical Garden in ~2010 from the Otradnoye tree nursery of the Komarov Botanical Institute as 10 years-old adult plants that were grown by Yu.A. Luks from seeds obtained from the Botanical Garden of the Riga University in 1985. The oldest cultivars of Rhododendron ledebourii in Peter the Great Botanical Garden represents by seed offspring from Altai obtained by E.G. Pobedimova in 1929.

Other botanical gardens which closest to the Peter the Great Botanical Garden, where Rh. ledebourii is cultivated, are located in Moscow (Russia), Tartu, and Tallinn (Estonia). This species has appeared in the Main Botanical Garden of Moscow only in the late 1940s. On all distance to the south from the Moscow and up to the northern limit of Rh. ledebourii nature distribution range, there are no tree nurseries would containing this species. Also, it should be noted that in Peter the Great Botanical Garden conditions, the Rh. ledebourii began to show certain signs of fungal diseases only during recent years. A seed origin of the main plantings of Rhododendron spp. of the Botanical Garden suggests that the rust infection can be occurred due to propagules of long-range transfer (Zmitrovich et al., 2003; Belomesyatseva, 2004). Since Chrysomyxa succinea is a macrocyclic species, it can be assumed that its stages 0 and I can be found, too, after careful examination of Picea jezoensis, which is available both from the collection of the Peter the Great Botanical Garden, and St. Petersburg State Forest Management University.

The work was carried out using technique of the Center “Cellular and Molecular Technologies for Studying Plants and Fungi” at Komarov Botanical Institute of the Russian Academy of Science. Laboratory work was supported by the RFBR grant (N 19-04-00024 A) and the State Research Task N AAAA-A19-119020890079-6.

Список литературы

  1. Aleksandrova M.S. Rhododendrons of the nature flora of the USSR. Nauka, Moscow, 1975 (in Russ.).

  2. Arthur J.Ch. Manual of the rusts of United States and Canada. Reprint by G.B. Cummins. Hafner, N.Y., 1962.

  3. Azbukina Z.M. Keybook to the fungi of Russia. Order Pucciniales. 1. Families Pucciniastraceae, Cronartiaceae, Coleosporiaceae, Melampsoraceae, Phakopsoraceae, Chaconiaceae, Mikronegeriaceae. Dalnauka, Vladivostok, 2015 (in Russ.).

  4. Belomesyatseva D.B. Mycobiota of juniper consortium in Belarus. Pravo i ekonomika, Minsk, 2004.

  5. Cao J., Tian Ch., Liang Y.M., You C. Two new Chrysomyxa rust species on the endemic plant, Picea asperata in western China, and expanded description of C. succinea. Phytotaxa. 2017. V. 292 (3). P. 218. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.292.3.2

  6. Crane P.E. Rust fungi on rhododendrons in Asia: Diaphanopellis forrestii gen. et sp. nov., new species of Caeoma, and expanded descriptions of Chrysomyxa dietelii and C. succinea. Mycologia. 2005. V. 97 (2). P. 534–548.

  7. Cummins G.B., Hiratsuka Y. Illustrated genera of rust fungi. APS Press, St. Paul, 2003.

  8. Farr D., Esteban H.B., Palm M.E. Fungi on Rhododendron: a world reference. Parkway Publ., Boone, 1996.

  9. Geltman D.V. (ed.). The Herbarium handbook. Kew, 1995 (in Russ.).

  10. Hiratsuka N., Sato S. Notes on Chrysomyxa on species of Rhododendron. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan. 1969. V. 10. P. 14–18.

  11. Ji J.X., Li Zh., Li Y., Kakishima M. Life cycle and taxonomy of Chrysomyxa succinea in China and phylogenetic positions of Caeoma species on Rhododendron. Forest Pathol. 2020. V. 50 (2). e12585. https://doi.org/10.1111/efp.12585

  12. Kuprevich V.F., Transhel V.G. Keybook to the rusts of USSR. 1. Family Melampsoraceae. Flora sporovykh rasteniy SSSR. Nauka, Moscow, Leningrad, 1957 (in Russ.).

  13. Poyarkova A.I. The genus Rhododendron. Flora of the USSR. V. 18. Academy of Sciences of the USSR, Moscow, Leningrad, 1952, pp. 31–61 (in Russ.).

  14. Saccardo P.A. Fungorum extra-europaeorum Pugillus. Michelia. 1880. V. 2 (6). P. 136–149.

  15. Savile D.B.O. North American species of Chrysomyxa. Can. J. Res. C. 1950. V. 28. P. 318–330.

  16. Spaulding P. Foreign diseases of forest trees of the world. Washington, 1961.

  17. Svyazeva O.A. Trees, shrubs and creepers of the park of the Botanical Garden of the Komarov Botanical Institute. (On the history of introduction to culture). Rostok, SPb., 2005 (in Russ.).

  18. Transhel V.G. Outline of rust fungi of USSR. Nauka, Moscow, Leningrad, 1939 (in Russ.).

  19. Zmitrovich I.V., Malysheva E.F., Malysheva V.F. Some concepts and terms of mycogeography: a critical review. Vestnik ekologii, lesovedeniya i landshaftovedeniya. 2003. N 4. P. 173–188 (in Russ.).

  20. Азбукина З.М. (Azbukina) Определитель грибов России. Порядок ржавчинные. 1. Семейства пукциниастровые, кронарциевые, мелампсоровые, факопсоровые, чакониевые, микронегериевые. Владивосток: Дальнаука, 2015. 281 с.

  21. Александрова М.С. (Aleksandrova) Рододендроны природной флоры СССР. М.: Наука, 1975. 112 с.

  22. Беломесяцева Д.Б. (Belomesyatseva) Микобиота в консорции можжевельника в Беларуси. Минск: Экономика и право, 2004. 236 с.

  23. Гельтман Д.В. (Geltman) (ред.) Гербарное дело. Справочное руководство. Русское издание. Кью: Королевские ботанические сады, 1995. 342 с.

  24. Змитрович И.В., Малышева Е.Ф., Малышева В.Ф. (Zmitrovich et al.) Некоторые понятия и термины микогеографии: критический обзор // Вестник экологии, лесоведения и ландшафтоведения. 2003. Вып. 4. С. 173–188.

  25. Купревич В.Ф., Траншель В.Г. (Kuprevich, Transhel) Ржавчинные грибы. 1. Сем. Melampsoraceae // Флора споровых растений СССР. Т. 4. М.; Л.: Наука, 1957. 419 с.

  26. Пояркова А.И. (Poyarkova) Род рододендрон // Флора СССР. Т. 18. М.-Л.: АН СССР, 1952. С. 31–61.

  27. Связева О.А. (Svyazeva) Деревья, кустарники и лианы парка Ботанического сада Ботанического института им. В.Л. Комарова (К истории введения в культуру). СПб.: Росток, 2005. 384 с.

  28. Траншель В.Г. (Transhel) Обзор ржавчинных грибов СССР. М.; Л.: Наука, 1939. 426 с.

Дополнительные материалы отсутствуют.