Биологические мембраны: Журнал мембранной и клеточной биологии, 2022, T. 39, № 6, стр. 457-473

Миелоидная дифференцировка повышает устойчивость лейкозных клеток к TRAIL-индуцированной гибели путем снижения экспрессии рецепторов DR4 и DR5

Я. В. Ломовская a*, М. И. Кобякова a, А. С. Сенотов a, И. С. Фадеева ab, А. И. Ломовский a, К. С. Краснов ab, Д. Ю. Штатнова ab, В. С. Акатов ab, Р. С. Фадеев ab

a Институт теоретической и экспериментальной биофизики РАН
142290 Пущино, Московская обл., Россия

b Пущинский государственный естественно-научный институт
142290 Пущино, Московская обл., Россия

* E-mail: yannalomovskaya@gmail.com

Поступила в редакцию 18.04.2022
После доработки 20.06.2022
Принята к публикации 22.06.2022

Аннотация

Изучение механизмов устойчивости опухолевых клеток к TRAIL-индуцированной гибели остается актуальной задачей, так как данный цитокин является важным высокоизбирательным молекулярным эффектором противоопухолевого иммунитета. В нашей работе показано, что у клеток лейкоза человека THP-1, HL-60 и K562 индукция экзогенными факторами миелоидной дифференцировки in vitro во всех направлениях миелопоэза, кроме эритроидоподобного, повышает устойчивость к TRAIL-индуцированной гибели, снижая экспрессию рецепторов DR4 и DR5 на клеточной поверхности. Было установлено также, что ONC201, туникамицин и SAHA (субероиланилид гидроксамовой кислоты), способные вызывать повышение экспрессии DR5 у лейкозных клеток, подавляли их TRAIL-резистентность, индуцированную факторами дифференцировки. Полученные результаты представляют интерес для разработки препаратов и стратегий для повышения эффективности лечения миелоидных лейкозов.

Ключевые слова: лейкозные клетки, цитокин TRAIL, клеточная гибель, миелоидная дифференцировка, резистентность

Список литературы

  1. Buchsbaum D.J., Zhou T., Lobuglio A.F. 2006. TRAIL receptor-targeted therapy. Future Oncol. 2 (4), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.2217/14796694.2.4.493

  2. Chamuleau M.E., Ossenkoppele G.J., van Rhenen A., van Dreunen L., Jirka S.M., Zevenbergen A. 2011. High TRAIL-R3 expression on leukemic blasts is associated with poor outcome and induces apoptosis-resistance which can be overcome by targeting TRAIL-R2. Leuk. Res. 35 (6), 741–749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2010.12.032

  3. Kaufmann S.H., Steensma D.P. 2005. On the TRAIL of a new therapy for leukemia. Leukemia. 19 (12), 2195–2202. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.leu.2403946

  4. Thapa B., Kc R., Uludag H. 2020. TRAIL therapy and prospective developments for cancer treatment. J. Control. Release. 326, 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.07.013

  5. Snajdauf M., Havlova K., Vachtenheim J.Jr., Ozaniak A., Lischke R., Bartunkova J., Smrz D., Strizova Z. 2021. The TRAIL in the treatment of human cancer: An update on clinical trials. Front Mol. Biosci. 8, 628332. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.628332

  6. Fadeev R., Chekanov A., Solovieva M., Bezborodova O., Nemtsova E., Dolgikh N., Fadeeva I., Senotov A., Kobyakova M., Evstratova Y., Yakubovskaya R., Akatov V. 2019. Improved anticancer effect of recombinant protein izTRAIL combined with sorafenib and peptide iRGD. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20 (3), 525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms20030525

  7. Testa U. 2010. TRAIL/TRAIL-R in hematologic malignancies. J. Cell Biochem. 110 (1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.22549

  8. Riccioni R., Pasquini L., Mariani G., Saulle E., Rossini A., Diverio D., Pelosi E., Vitale A., Chierichini A., Cedrone M., Foà R., Lo Coco F., Peschle C., Testa U. 2005. TRAIL decoy receptors mediate resistance of acute myeloid leukemia cells to TRAIL. Haematologica. 90 (5), 612–624.

  9. Austin R., Smyth M.J., Lane S.W. 2016. Harnessing the immune system in acute myeloid leukaemia. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 103, 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.04.020

  10. Sag D., Ayyildiz Z.O., Gunalp S., Wingender G. 2019. The role of TRAIL/DRs in the modulation of immune cells and responses. Cancers (Basel). 11 (10), 1469. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11101469

  11. Cheng J., Hylander B.L., Baer M.R., Chen X., Repasky E.A. 2006. Multiple mechanisms underlie resistance of leukemia cells to Apo2 Ligand/TRAIL. Mol. Cancer Ther. 5 (7), 1844–1853. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0050

  12. Kobyakova M.I., Evstratova Y.V., Senotov A.S., Lomovsky A.I., Minaichev V.V., Zvyagina A.I., Solovieva M.E., Fadeeva I.S., Akatov V.S., Fadeev R.S. 2021. Appearance of signs of differentiation and pro-inflammatory phenotype in acute myeloid leukemia cells THP-1 at their Increased TRAIL resistance in cell aggregates in vitro. Biochemistry (Moscow), Supplement Series A: Membrane and Cell Biology. 15 (1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1990747821010050

  13. Lomovskaya Y.V., Kobyakova M.I., Senotov A.S., Lomovsky A.I., Minaychev V.V., Fadeeva I.S., Shtatnova D.Y., Krasnov K.S., Zvyagina A.I., Akatov V.S., Fadeev R.S. 2022. Macrophage-like THP-1 cells derived from high-density cell culture are resistant to TRAIL-induced cell death via down-regulation of death-receptors DR4 and DR5. Biomolecules. 12 (2), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/biom12020150

  14. Evstratova Y.V., Kobyakova M.I., Novikova V.V., Senotov A.S., Akatov V.S., Fadeev R.S. 2019. Monocyte-macrophage differentiation suppresses the expression of proapoptotic receptors to Apo2L/TRAIL and increases resistance to TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Biophysics. 64, 729–731. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0006350919050038

  15. Shiiki K., Yoshikawa H., Kinoshita H., Takeda M., Ueno A., Nakajima Y., Tasaka K. 2000. Potential mechanisms of resistance to TRAIL/Apo2L-induced apoptosis in human promyelocytic leukemia HL-60 cells during granulocytic differentiation. Cell Death Differ. 7 (10), 939–946. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400727

  16. Bamezai S., Buske C. 2019. Cutting Off Leukemogenesis: Hydra-like plasticity of mature leukemic cells. Cell Stem Cell. 25 (2), 167–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2019.07.005

  17. McKenzie M.D., Ghisi M., Oxley E.P., Ngo S., Cimmino L., Esnault C., Liu R., Salmon M.J., Bell C.C., Ahmed N., Erlichster M., Witkowski T.M., Liu J.G., Chopin M., Dakic A., Simankowicz E., Pomilio G., Vu T., Krsmanovic P., Su S., Tian L., Baldwin M.T., Zalcenstein A.D., DiRago L., Wang S., Metcalf D., Johnstone W.R., Croker A.B., Lancaster I.G., Murphy J.A., Naik H.S., Nutt L.S., Pospisil V., Schroeder T., Wall M., Dawson A.M., Wei H.A., de Thé H., Ritchie E.M., Zuber J., Dickins A.R. 2019. Interconversion between tumorigenic and differentiated states in acute myeloid leukemia. Cell Stem Cell. 25 (2), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stem.2019.07.001

  18. Ngo S., Oxley E.P., Ghisi M., Garwood M.M., McKenzie M.D., Mitchell H.L., Kanellakis P., Susanto O., Hickey M.J., Perkins A.C., Kile B.T., Dickins R.A. 2021. Acute myeloid leukemia maturation lineage influences residual disease and relapse following differentiation therapy. Nat. Commun. 12 (1), 6546. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26849-w

  19. Boyd A.L., Aslostovar L., Reid J., Ye W., Tanasijevic B., Porras D.P., Shapovalova Z., Almakadi M., Foley R., Leber B., Xenocostas A., Bhatia M. 2019. Identification of chemotherapy-induced leukemic-regenerating cells reveals a transient vulnerability of human AML recurrence. Cancer Cell. 34 (3), 483–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.007

  20. Pei S., Pollyea D.A., Gustafson A., Stevens B.M., Minhajuddin M., Fu R., Riemondy A.K., Gillen E.A., Sheridan M.R., Kim J., Costello C.J., Amaya L.M., Inguva A., Winters A., Ye H., Krug A., Jones L.C., Adane B., Khan N., Ponder J., Schowinsky J., Abbott D., Hammes A., Myers R.J., Ashton M.J., Nemkov T., D’Alessandro A., Gutman A.J., Ramsey E.H., Savona R.M., Smith A.C., Jordan T.C. 2020. Monocytic subclones confer resistance to venetoclax-based therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Discov. 10 (4), 536–551. https://doi.org/10.1158/2159-8290.CD-19-0710

  21. Kuusanmaki H., Leppa A.M., Polonen P., Kontro M., Dufva O., Deb D., Yadav B., Brück O., Kumar A., Everaus H., Gjertsen T.B., Heinäniemi M., Porkka K., Mustjoki S., Heckman A.C. 2020. Phenotype-based drug screening reveals association between venetoclax response and differentiation stage in acute myeloid leukemia. Haematologica. 105 (3), 708–720. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2018.214882

  22. Drach J., Lopez-Berestein G., McQueen T., Andreeff M., Mehta K. 1993. Induction of differentiation in myeloid leukemia cell lines and acute promyelocytic leukemia cells by liposomal all-trans-retinoic acid. Cancer Research. 53 (9), 2100–2104.

  23. Daigneault M., Preston J.A., Marriott H.M., Whyte M.K., Dockrell D.H. 2010. The identification of markers of macrophage differentiation in PMA-stimulated THP-1 cells and monocyte-derived macrophages. PLoS One. 5 (1), e8668. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0008668

  24. Forrester M.A., Wassall H.J., Hall L.S., Cao H., Wilson H.M., Barker R.N., Vickers A.M. 2018. Similarities and differences in surface receptor expression by THP-1 monocytes and differentiated macrophages polarized using seven different conditioning regimens. Cell Immunol. 332, 58–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellimm.2018.07.008

  25. Newburger P.E., Chovaniec M.E., Greenberger J.S., Cohen H.J. 1979. Functional changes in human leukemic cell line HL-60. A model for myeloid differentiation. J. Cell Biol. 82 (2), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.82.2.315

  26. Tasseff R., Jensen H.A., Congleton J., Dai D., Rogers K.V., Sagar A., Bunaciu R.P., Yen A., Varner J.D. 2017. An effective model of the retinoic acid induced HL-60 differentiation program. Sci. Rep. 7 (1), 14327. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14523-5

  27. Baxter S.S., Carlson L.A., Mayer A.M., Hall M.L., Fay M.J. 2009. Granulocytic differentiation of HL-60 promyelocytic leukemia cells is associated with increased expression of Cul5. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Anim. 45 (5–6), 264–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11626-008-9163-4

  28. Huang R., Zhao L., Chen H., Yin R.H., Li C.Y., Zhan Y.Q., Zhang J.H., Ge C., Yu M., Yang X.M. 2014. Megakaryocytic differentiation of K562 cells induced by PMA reduced the activity of respiratory chain complex IV. PLoS One. 9 (5), e96246. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096246

  29. Kim K.W., Kim S.H., Lee E.Y., Kim N.D., Kang H.S., Kim H.D., Chung B.S., Kang C.D. 2001. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase/90-KDA ribosomal S6 kinase/nuclear factor-kappa B pathway mediates phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced megakaryocytic differentiation of K562 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276 (16), 13 186–13 191. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M008092200

  30. Nurhayati R.W., Ojima Y., Nomura N., Taya M. 2014. Promoted megakaryocytic differentiation of K562 cells through oxidative stress caused by near ultraviolet irradiation. Cell Mol. Biol. Lett. 19 (4), 590–600. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11658-014-0215-3

  31. Herrera R., Hubbell S., Decker S., Petruzzelli L. 1998. A role for the MEK/MAPK pathway in PMA-induced cell cycle arrest: modulation of megakaryocytic differentiation of K562 cells. Exp. Cell Res. 238 (2), 407–414. https://doi.org/10.1006/excr.1997.3847

  32. Zhang D., Cho E., Wong J. 2007. A critical role for the co-repressor N-CoR in erythroid differentiation and heme synthesis. Cell Res. 17 (9), 804–814. https://doi.org/10.1038/cr.2007.72

  33. Huo X.F., Yu J., Peng H., Du Z.W., Liu X.L., Ma Y.N., Zhang X., Zhang Y., Zhao H., Zhang J. 2006. Differential expression changes in K562 cells during the hemin-induced erythroid differentiation and the phorbol myristate acetate (PMA)-induced megakaryocytic differentiation. Mol. Cell Biochem. 292 (1–2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11010-006-9229-0

  34. Shariati L., Modaress M., Khanahmad H., Hejazi Z., Tabatabaiefar M.A., Salehi M., Modarressi H.M. 2016. Comparison of different methods for erythroid differentiation in the K562 cell line. Biotechnol. Lett. 38 (8), 1243–1250. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-016-2101-8

  35. Witt O., Sand K., Pekrun A. 2000. Butyrate-induced erythroid differentiation of human K562 leukemia cells involves inhibition of ERK and activation of p38 MAP kinase pathways. Blood. 95 (7), 2391–2396. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V95.7.2391

  36. Burzynski L.C., Pugh N., Clarke M.C.H. 2019. Platelet isolation and activation assays. Bio Protoc. 9 (20), e3405. https://doi.org/10.21769/BioProtoc.3405

  37. Lannutti B.J., Blake N., Gandhi M.J., Reems J.A., Drachman J.G. 2005. Induction of polyploidization in leukemic cell lines and primary bone marrow by Src kinase inhibitor SU6656. Blood. 105 (10), 3875–3878. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2004-10-3934

  38. Koury M.J., Sawyer S.T., Brandt S.J. 2002. New insights into erythropoiesis. Curr. Opin. Hematol. 9 (2), 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1097/00062752-200203000-00002

  39. Li J., Xia Y., Bertino A.M., Coburn J.P., Kuter D.J. 2000. The mechanism of apoptosis in human platelets during storage. Transfusion. 40 (11), 1320–1329. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1537-2995.2000.40111320.x

  40. Wu L.S., Wang X.W., He W., Ma X.T., Wang H.Y., Han M., Li B. 2019. TRAIL inhibits platelet-induced colorectal cancer cell invasion. J. Int. Med. Res. 47 (2), 962–972. https://doi.org/10.1177/0300060518820785

  41. Martin-Perez R., Niwa M., Lopez-Rivas A. 2012. ER stress sensitizes cells to TRAIL through down-regulation of FLIP and Mcl-1 and PERK-dependent up-regulation of TRAIL-R2. Apoptosis. 17 (4), 349–363

  42. Guo X., Meng Y., Sheng X., Guan Y., Zhang F., Han Z., Kang Y., Tai G., Zhou Y., Cheng H. 2017. Tunicamycin enhances human colon cancer cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by JNK-CHOP-mediated DR5 upregulation and the inhibition of the EGFR pathway. Anticancer Drugs. 28 (1), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000000431

  43. Nakata S., Yoshida T., Horinaka M., Shiraishi T., Wakada M., Sakai T. 2004. Histone deacetylase inhibitors upregulate death receptor 5/TRAIL-R2 and sensitize apoptosis induced by TRAIL/APO2-L in human malignant tumor cells. Oncogene. 23 (37), 6261–6271. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207830

  44. Hietakangas V., Poukkula M., Heiskanen K.M., Karvinen J.T., Sistonen L., Eriksson J.E. 2003. Erythroid differentiation sensitizes K562 leukemia cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by downregulation of c-FLIP. Mol. Cell Biol. 23 (4), 1278–1291. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.23.4.1278-1291.2003

  45. Mirandola P., Gobbi G., Ponti C., Sponzilli I., Cocco L., Vitale M. 2006. PKCepsilon controls protection against TRAIL in erythroid progenitors. Blood. 107 (2), 508–513. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-07-2676

  46. Vitale M., Gobbi G., Mirandola P., Ponti C., Sponzilli I., Rinaldi L., F A Manzoli A.F. 2006. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and erythropoiesis: A role for PKC epsilon. Eur. J. Histochem. 50 (1), 15–18.

  47. Secchiero P., Melloni E., Heikinheimo M., Mannisto S., Di Pietro R., Iacone A., Zauli G. 2004. TRAIL regulates normal erythroid maturation through an ERK-dependent pathway. Blood. 103 (2), 517–522. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2003-06-2137

  48. De Maria R., Zeuner A., Eramo A., Domenichelli C., Bonci D., Grignani F., Srinivasula S.M., Alnemri E.S., Testa U., Peschle C. 1999. Negative regulation of erythropoiesis by caspase-mediated cleavage of GATA-1. Nature. 401 (6752), 489–493. https://doi.org/10.1038/46809

  49. Lafont E. 2020. Stress management: Death receptor signalling and cross-talks with the unfolded protein response in cancer. Cancers (Basel). 12 (5), 1113. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12051113

  50. Jung Y.H., Lim E.J., Heo J., Kwon T.K., Kim Y.H. 2012. Tunicamycin sensitizes human prostate cells to TRAIL-induced apoptosis by upregulation of TRAIL receptors and downregulation of cIAP2. Int. J. Oncol. 40 (6), 1941–1948. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo.2012.1402

  51. Glab J.A., Doerflinger M., Nedeva C., Jose I., Mbogo G.W., Paton J.C., Paton W.A., Kueh J.A., Herold J.M., Huang C.D., Segal D., Brumatti G., Puthalakath H. 2017. DR5 and caspase-8 are dispensable in ER stress-induced apoptosis. Cell Death Differ. 24 (5), 944–950. https://doi.org/10.1038/cdd.2017.53

  52. Yu L., Xie R., Tian T., Zheng L., Tang L., Cai S., Ma Z., Yang T., Han B., Yang Q. 2019. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid upregulates histone acetylation and activates endoplasmic reticulum stress to induce apoptosis in HepG2 liver cancer cells. Oncol. Lett. 18 (4), 3537–3544. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2019.10705

  53. Prabhu V.V., Morrow S., Rahman Kawakibi A., Zhou L., Ralff M., Ray J., Jhaveri A., Ferrarini I., Lee Y., Parker C., Zhang Y., Borsuk R., Chang W., Honeyman N.J., Tavora F., Carneiro B., Raufi A., Huntington K., Carlsen L., Louie A., Safran H., Seyhan A.A., Tarapore S.R., Schalop L., Stogniew M., Allen E.J., Oster W., El-Deiry S.W. 2020. ONC201 and imipridones: Anti-cancer compounds with clinical efficacy. Neoplasia. 22 (12), 725–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2020.09.005

  54. Schuler S., Fritsche P., Diersch S., Arlt A., Schmid R.M., Saur D., Schneider G. 2010. HDAC2 attenuates TRAIL-induced apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells. Mol. Cancer. 9, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-80

  55. Cao H., Cheng Y., You L., Qian J., Qian W. 2013. Homoharringtonine and SAHA synergistically enhance apoptosis in human acute myeloid leukemia cells through upregulation of TRAIL and death receptors. Mol. Med. Rep. 7 (6), 1838–1844. https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2013.1440

  56. Allen J.E., Crowder R.N., El-Deiry W.S. 2015. First-in-class small molecule ONC201 induces DR5 and cell death in tumor but not normal cells to provide a wide therapeutic index as an anti-cancer agent. PLoS One. 10 (11), e0143082. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143082

  57. Zhang Y., Zhou L., Safran H., Borsuk R., Lulla R., Tapinos N., Seyhan A.A., El-Deiry W.S. EZH2i EPZ-6438 and HDACi vorinostat synergize with ONC201/TIC10 to activate integrated stress response, DR5, reduce H3K27 methylation, ClpX and promote apoptosis of multiple tumor types including DIPG. Neoplasia. 23 (8), 792–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neo.2021.06.007

Дополнительные материалы отсутствуют.